<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pajama Pages &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pajamapages.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pajamapages.com</link>
	<description>Media, Church, Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 21:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Infectious Chutzpah</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/infectious-chutzpah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/infectious-chutzpah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago we noted how a local minister was thinking that we could use our technology to help God out with his kingdom building. Now the same kind of thinking has reached all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Last week, President Obama told a group of rabbis, &#8220;We are God&#8217;s partners [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago we noted how <a href="?p=2805">a local minister was thinking</a> that we could use our technology to help God out with his kingdom building. Now the same kind of thinking has reached all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.</p>
<p>Last week, President Obama told a group of rabbis, &#8220;We are God&#8217;s partners in matters of life and death.&#8221; Besides being a devastating way to refute Sarah Palin&#8217;s death panels argument (that&#8217;s sarcasm, Albert), it prompted this fine bit of theologizing from <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/andrewklavan/2009/08/21/a-subtle-theological-point/">Andrew Klavan</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13px; color: #000000; line-height: 16px;">I would like to make a subtle theological point:  No, we’re not.  For those of you who aren’t versed in the finer points of theology, let me try to simplify that for you:  No.  We’re not.  Or to put it even more simply:  No.  We.  Are.  Not.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13px; color: #000000; line-height: 16px;">&#8230;When God tells Jeremiah (1:5),  “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you,” or when he sarcastically asks Job (38:17), “Have the gates of death been opened unto thee?  Or hast thou seen the doors of the shadow of death?” does that sound to you like a guy discussing matters with his partners?  To me, God really seems to be suggesting there that we humans know sweet suffering goose-egg about the greater mysteries of life and death.  Indeed, he seems to feel that the understanding of those mysteries is reserved for him alone and their disposition in his sole power.  It’s possible, if properly understood, he might include even Barack Obama in his list of people whose partnership he is not soliciting in these matters.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13px; color: #000000; line-height: 16px;">Well. Said.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 0px; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13px; color: #000000; line-height: 16px;">HT: <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/83827/">Instapundit</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/infectious-chutzpah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The utility of Great Satans</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/the-utility-of-great-satans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/the-utility-of-great-satans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back we were discussing the wisdom of attacking Satan, and after three posts I thought I had dealt with the issue. Not quite. Consider this the fourth in that series. One of the points I made in the first post was that a defining characteristic of false teachers is that they disrespect Satan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back <a href="?p=2595">we were discussing</a> the wisdom of attacking Satan, and after three posts I thought I had dealt with the issue. Not quite. Consider this the fourth in that series.</p>
<p>One of the points I made in the first post was that a defining characteristic of false teachers is that they disrespect Satan and his horde of celestial beings. At the time, I referred to the idea as counterintuitive, which got me thinking. Why is it that contrabiblical teachers also tend to be anti-Satan?</p>
<p>I think we can find part of the answer in Iran. If you have the courage and bad fortune to attend a state-supported public rally there or in several other Muslim countries, you&#8217;re very likely to hear the leaders exhorting the crowd in chants of &#8220;Death to America&#8221; or &#8220;Death to the Great Satan&#8221; (same thing). For a while, George W. Bush was the face of the Great Satan, and Barack Obama came to office hoping to change the satanic perception of America. Some may have been surprised when two weeks <em>before</em> his inauguration, Obama had become the newest incarnation of the ever-threatening Great Satan. As <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZWE3OTk3OTI2MzE3MTVlZjkxYjliZGU4YjMwMjlkMzU=">Mark Steyn observed</a>, &#8220;Meet the new Great Satan, the same as the Old&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Here was a diplomacy-loving, Muslim-raised new leader who had promised to remake our relationship with the Muslim world. Why, then, was Obama Satanized?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simply because the leaders of countries like Iran, Syria, Venezuela, and North Korea need an all-powerful enemy to blame for the basketcases that they&#8217;ve turned their countries into. Iran, one of the world&#8217;s most important suppliers of oil, would be crippled if we cut off petroleum imports, such is the country&#8217;s economic disrepair. To prevent the public from turning on the mullahs and &#8220;elected&#8221; leaders for causing the problems that they live with every day, it&#8217;s more convenient to blame the Great Satan. If it were ever known that the United States was not a threat and was, very often, a source of important humanitarian aid, leaders would lose the ability to rally public anger against the imaginary foreign devil.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the key point: <strong>enemies create unity and passion that is independent of a leader.</strong></p>
<p>George Orwell understood the point as well, and illustrated it in <em>1984</em> with his description of the <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=DfQlqJxcl0MC&amp;pg=PA403&amp;lpg=PA403&amp;dq=As+usual,+the+face+of+Emmanuel+Goldstein,+the+Enemy+of+the+People&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=7SvfuLaUW2&amp;sig=uzZgL0l9pUgFANGMbKss6upOMaA&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=lMWJSr_zCIuMtge3g9nnDA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=9#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">Two Minutes Hate</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>As usual, the face of Emmanuel Goldstein, the Enemy of the People, had flashed on to the screen. There were hisses here and there among the audience. Goldstein was the renegade and backslider who once, long ago (how long ago nobody quite remembered), had been one of the leading figures of the Party, almost on a level with Big Brother himself, and then had engaged in counter-revolutionary activities, had been condemned to death and had mysteriously escaped and disappeared.</p>
<p>The programmes of the Two Minutes Hate varied from day to day, but there was none in which Goldstein was not the principal figure. He was the primal traitor, the earliest defiler of the Party&#8217;s purity. All subsequent crimes against the Party, all treacheries, acts of sabotage, heresies, deviations, sprang directly out of his teaching. Somewhere or other he was still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters, perhaps even &#8211; so it was occasionally rumoured &#8211; in some hiding-place in Oceania itself&#8230;</p>
<p>In its second minute the Hate rose to a frenzy. People were leaping up and down in their places and shouting at the tops of their voices in an effort to drown the maddening bleating voice that came from the screen&#8230;</p>
<p>The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part, but, on the contrary, that it was impossible to avoid joining in. A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge-hammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one&#8217;s will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic&#8230;</p>
<p>At those moments his secret loathing of Big Brother changed into adoration.</p></blockquote>
<p>And that&#8217;s the key. If I can get you to hate an enemy I rage against, perhaps I can get you to love me without having to offer you any good reason to do so. That&#8217;s why false teachers need a Great Satan.</p>
<p>If you can focus my attention on fighting an enemy who doesn&#8217;t need to be fought, you can distract me from worrying about the veracity of your teaching.</p>
<p>If you can make me join you in facing down what appears to be a common enemy, I might not ever wonder if you might also be my enemy.</p>
<p>And if you make a habit of denouncing every other church in town, I might conclude that yours is the only source of truth and salvation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/the-utility-of-great-satans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton is theologically correct</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/hillary-clinton-is-theologically-correct/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/hillary-clinton-is-theologically-correct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jduncan.com/blog/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not often, but when she is, it&#8217;s worth pointing out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not often, but <a mce_href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=15511" href="http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=15511">when she is</a>, it&#8217;s worth pointing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/hillary-clinton-is-theologically-correct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That&#8217;s a stack of money</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/thats-a-stack-of-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/thats-a-stack-of-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jduncan.com/blog/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A trillion dollars is difficult to comprehend, but this visual depiction is helpful, amazing, and ultimately depressing. HT: The Corner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A trillion dollars is difficult to comprehend, but <a href="http://www.pagetutor.com/trillion/index.html">this visual depiction</a> is helpful, amazing, and ultimately depressing.</p>
<p>HT: <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDZiZWJiMTQyZmYyZTQwZjBlMGU4ZGUzYTNiMjM2ZjE=">The Corner</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/thats-a-stack-of-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s play Cabinet musical chairs</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/lets-play-cabinet-musical-chairs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/lets-play-cabinet-musical-chairs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jduncan.com/blog/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim Geithner, for whom a 1040 tax form is too complicated, does understand what&#8217;s wrong with the climate and knows how to fix it. &#8220;We don&#8217;t believe it makes sense to significantly subsidize the production and use of sources of energy (like oil and gas) that are dramatically going to add to our climate change [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Geithner, for whom a 1040 tax form is too complicated, does understand what&#8217;s wrong with the climate and <a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/oilRpt/idINN0454844120090304">knows how to fix it</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t believe it makes sense to significantly subsidize the production and use of sources of energy (like oil and gas) that are dramatically going to add to our climate change (problem). We don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s good economic policy and we think changing those incentives is good for the country,&#8221; Geithner told the Senate Finance Committee at a hearing on the White House&#8217;s proposed budget for the 2010 spending year.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps we can ask the head of the EPA to give us a plan to save the banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/lets-play-cabinet-musical-chairs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;ll need to drive with earplugs</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/youll-need-to-drive-with-earplugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/youll-need-to-drive-with-earplugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people start putting these on their cars, it&#8217;s going to get loud. H/T: The Corner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people start putting these on their cars, it&#8217;s going to get loud.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-581" title="mortgagestickerwebimage1" src="http://www.pajamapages.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/mortgagestickerwebimage1-300x90.gif" alt="mortgagestickerwebimage1" width="300" height="90" /></p>
<p>H/T: <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTEzZDBkZmUzMzk2Y2ZhMzZjMzU1MTMwZDkwYWJkZmQ=">The Corner</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/youll-need-to-drive-with-earplugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are governed by morons: Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/we-are-governed-by-morons-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/we-are-governed-by-morons-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jduncan.com/blog/?p=577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Biden forgets the number for his website.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Biden forgets the number for his <a href="http://wbztv.com/video/?id=73411@wbz.dayport.com">website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/we-are-governed-by-morons-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal needs some speech practice</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/jindal-needs-some-speech-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/jindal-needs-some-speech-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jduncan.com/blog/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Bobby Jindal a great deal, but he&#8217;s not ready for prime time. He sounds like he&#8217;s reading a story to a group of school children. Talking to the American people should not sound like you&#8217;re talking to the voters&#8217; kids. Palin scored with her speeches because she talked to Americans like we were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Bobby Jindal a great deal, but he&#8217;s not ready for prime time. He sounds like he&#8217;s reading a story to a group of school children. Talking to the American people should not sound like you&#8217;re talking to the voters&#8217; kids.</p>
<p>Palin scored with her speeches because she talked to Americans like we were adults. Reagan was the master of it. Clinton could do it. Gore was and still is hopeless at it.</p>
<p>Governor Jindal, show us the respect of talking&#8211;talking&#8211;to us like real people, and we&#8217;ll be more likely to do you the favor of giving you our vote.</p>
<p>Based on tonight, Palin&#8217;s still ahead of Jindal for 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/jindal-needs-some-speech-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are governed by morons, Part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/we-are-governed-by-morons-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/we-are-governed-by-morons-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jduncan.com/blog/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate Banking Committee chairman, Chris Dodd, opened his mouth yesterday and sent bank stocks plummeting briefly when he suggested that bank nationalization would probably be necessary. The senator’s stupid comment is a reminder that it is hard to overstate the degree to which incompetence can be found in the overpaid senior levels of our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate Banking Committee chairman, Chris Dodd, opened his mouth yesterday and sent bank stocks plummeting briefly when he suggested that bank nationalization would probably be necessary.</p>
<blockquote><p>The senator’s stupid comment is a reminder that it is hard to overstate the degree to which incompetence can be found in the overpaid senior levels of our life, whether in the corporate management suite or the halls of government.</p>
<p>Never assume that the chairman of a legislative banking committee is an expert on banking, or the chief executive of a bank fully understands the investments his own institution is getting into. In real life there is no “Mission: Impossible,” nor even a “West Wing.” In real life, many key jobs are filled by people who don’t really know what they are doing.</p></blockquote>
<p>H/T: <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/70982/">Instapundit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/we-are-governed-by-morons-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush asks Obama for a weasel-free answer</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/rush-asks-obama-for-a-weasel-free-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pajamapages.com/rush-asks-obama-for-a-weasel-free-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairness Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jduncan.com/blog/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s WSJ op-ed asks Obama to rule out all forms of content-monitoring and control on radio.  I have a straightforward question, which I hope you will answer in a straightforward way: Is it your intention to censor talk radio through a variety of contrivances, such as &#8220;local content,&#8221; &#8220;diversity of ownership,&#8221; and &#8220;public interest&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123508978035028163.html">WSJ op-ed</a> asks Obama to rule out all forms of content-monitoring and control on radio. </p>
<blockquote><p>I have a straightforward question, which I hope you will answer in a straightforward way: Is it your intention to censor talk radio through a variety of contrivances, such as &#8220;local content,&#8221; &#8220;diversity of ownership,&#8221; and &#8220;public interest&#8221; rules &#8212; all of which are designed to appeal to populist sentiments but, as you know, are the death knell of talk radio and the AM band?</p></blockquote>
<p>Limbaugh reminds the President that the primary purpose of the First Amendment is to prevent the government from restricting critical political speech.</p>
<blockquote><p>The fact that the federal government issues broadcast licenses, the original purpose of which was to regulate radio signals, ought not become an excuse to destroy one of the most accessible and popular marketplaces of expression. The AM broadcast spectrum cannot honestly be considered a &#8220;scarce&#8221; resource.</p></blockquote>
<p>Will Obama answer Rush? Probably not.</p>
<p>Will a reporter ask him at his next press conference? Good luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pajamapages.com/rush-asks-obama-for-a-weasel-free-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
