<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dangerous flirtations with heresy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/</link>
	<description>Media, Church, Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-5005</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-5005</guid>
		<description>Brad does not need to explain anything just because you all THINK he worded it oddly. I understood it from the beginning and I am not the only one. Look Rob Bell is controversial to say the very least--I have read two books but have not listened to any sermons or speaking engagements by him. Therefore I cant say anything to that end except that I will probably eventually agree with you regarding him--just not yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad does not need to explain anything just because you all THINK he worded it oddly. I understood it from the beginning and I am not the only one. Look Rob Bell is controversial to say the very least&#8211;I have read two books but have not listened to any sermons or speaking engagements by him. Therefore I cant say anything to that end except that I will probably eventually agree with you regarding him&#8211;just not yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-5004</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-5004</guid>
		<description>David -- What is wrong with what Perry listened to in his IPOD TWO YEARS AGO! Wow man you are digging!! Nothing better to do with your time huh? WOW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8212; What is wrong with what Perry listened to in his IPOD TWO YEARS AGO! Wow man you are digging!! Nothing better to do with your time huh? WOW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Horn</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-5003</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Horn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-5003</guid>
		<description>I think Cooper would be better served to put down the Rob Bell books and advise Noble to do the same http://www.perrynoble.com/2007/06/08/i-pod/ 

Bell and heretics like him will only create confusion and cause problems within the church. 

I had to read Cooper&#039;s tweet several times trying to figure out if he just typed without thinking. Either way it&#039;s very poorly worded. I hope Cooper explains what he meant on his blog very soon. If anyone has Cooper&#039;s ear then please ask him to explain this statement in detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Cooper would be better served to put down the Rob Bell books and advise Noble to do the same <a href="http://www.perrynoble.com/2007/06/08/i-pod/" rel="nofollow">http://www.perrynoble.com/2007/06/08/i-pod/</a> </p>
<p>Bell and heretics like him will only create confusion and cause problems within the church. </p>
<p>I had to read Cooper&#8217;s tweet several times trying to figure out if he just typed without thinking. Either way it&#8217;s very poorly worded. I hope Cooper explains what he meant on his blog very soon. If anyone has Cooper&#8217;s ear then please ask him to explain this statement in detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-5002</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-5002</guid>
		<description>Josh, you&#039;re onto something that I missed in my focus on the first part of the statement. The first part is highly suspect, but the second part is dead wrong. We are not saved by any change. We are saved by the Savior through faith. 

Change comes after we&#039;re saved and as a result of salvation. It&#039;s the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit that changes us, not the resurrection.

The appeal to Romans 6 (though we can&#039;t be sure exactly what part the author had in mind) is yet another echo of the Bell approach to the resurrection as being primarily a personal, mystical experience. The historical resurrection, according to the emergents, is not nearly as important as the personal spiritual resurrections we can experience. This adopted Cooper tweet completely falls in line with that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, you&#8217;re onto something that I missed in my focus on the first part of the statement. The first part is highly suspect, but the second part is dead wrong. We are not saved by any change. We are saved by the Savior through faith. </p>
<p>Change comes after we&#8217;re saved and as a result of salvation. It&#8217;s the sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit that changes us, not the resurrection.</p>
<p>The appeal to Romans 6 (though we can&#8217;t be sure exactly what part the author had in mind) is yet another echo of the Bell approach to the resurrection as being primarily a personal, mystical experience. The historical resurrection, according to the emergents, is not nearly as important as the personal spiritual resurrections we can experience. This adopted Cooper tweet completely falls in line with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-4998</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-4998</guid>
		<description>Josh,

Cooper may very well mean the latter. After seeing your previous discussion regarding grace, perseverance of the saints, etc... I&#039;m not going to go there! Honestly, I not sure which side is right, or even which side Cooper would side with.

My argument is simply that the original post that claims that &quot;Cooper seems to be endorsing the idea that believing that the resurrection is a historical fact is optional to our faith&quot; is reading more into Cooper&#039;s words than were intended, or should be reasonably inferred from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>Cooper may very well mean the latter. After seeing your previous discussion regarding grace, perseverance of the saints, etc&#8230; I&#8217;m not going to go there! Honestly, I not sure which side is right, or even which side Cooper would side with.</p>
<p>My argument is simply that the original post that claims that &#8220;Cooper seems to be endorsing the idea that believing that the resurrection is a historical fact is optional to our faith&#8221; is reading more into Cooper&#8217;s words than were intended, or should be reasonably inferred from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I&#039;m saying, JT.  

As to Cooper&#039;s tweet, I do think it&#039;s pretty ambiguous.  I guess it really depends on what he means by &quot;being changed.&quot;  If he means that by faith in Christ we become born again and new creatures, I agree.  If he means that because we believe the resurrection we are saved if we &quot;turn from our sin&quot; and become a Christ-follower, I disagree.  I guess I couldn&#039;t really draw conclusions based on that little info, but I agree that it&#039;s subject to multiple interpretations, some which are right, some which are wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m saying, JT.  </p>
<p>As to Cooper&#8217;s tweet, I do think it&#8217;s pretty ambiguous.  I guess it really depends on what he means by &#8220;being changed.&#8221;  If he means that by faith in Christ we become born again and new creatures, I agree.  If he means that because we believe the resurrection we are saved if we &#8220;turn from our sin&#8221; and become a Christ-follower, I disagree.  I guess I couldn&#8217;t really draw conclusions based on that little info, but I agree that it&#8217;s subject to multiple interpretations, some which are right, some which are wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeithO</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-4988</link>
		<dc:creator>KeithO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-4988</guid>
		<description>JT,

I lean more towards your view of what I think he said.  Acknowledging the resurection doesn&#039;t save, but if you don&#039;t believe in the resurrection, you can&#039;t go any further in your faith.  Resurrection is part and parcel to faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT,</p>
<p>I lean more towards your view of what I think he said.  Acknowledging the resurection doesn&#8217;t save, but if you don&#8217;t believe in the resurrection, you can&#8217;t go any further in your faith.  Resurrection is part and parcel to faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-4983</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-4983</guid>
		<description>Josh- Are you saying that we are saved based upon our belief (about who Jesus is, and what He did), and by our asking for salvation?

If so, we agree. The point that Cooper is making is that knowledge alone does not equal salvation.

James Duncan- I disagree that this tweet needs to be reworded. It was clear as the sky in San Diego to me. Cooper&#039;s statement is remarkably similar to what I&#039;ve heard pastor&#039;s say from the pulpit throughout my life. 

Now, maybe if I&#039;d just heard Bell say something similar, I&#039;d have read it as you did. But I still don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to read anything into his tweet beyond what he actually said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh- Are you saying that we are saved based upon our belief (about who Jesus is, and what He did), and by our asking for salvation?</p>
<p>If so, we agree. The point that Cooper is making is that knowledge alone does not equal salvation.</p>
<p>James Duncan- I disagree that this tweet needs to be reworded. It was clear as the sky in San Diego to me. Cooper&#8217;s statement is remarkably similar to what I&#8217;ve heard pastor&#8217;s say from the pulpit throughout my life. </p>
<p>Now, maybe if I&#8217;d just heard Bell say something similar, I&#8217;d have read it as you did. But I still don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to read anything into his tweet beyond what he actually said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-4982</link>
		<dc:creator>James Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-4982</guid>
		<description>JT, yes, he should have adjusted his wording, &lt;em&gt;especially&lt;/em&gt; because some might interpret his words incorrectly. As I&#039;ve pointed out again in the Rob Bell post, this tweet so very similar to the trash that&#039;s coming out of the emergent church that he should have known not to repeat it. If he doesn&#039;t know what kind of material is coming from Bell and co, what is he doing leading kids who think Bell is the cat&#039;s pajamas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT, yes, he should have adjusted his wording, <em>especially</em> because some might interpret his words incorrectly. As I&#8217;ve pointed out again in the Rob Bell post, this tweet so very similar to the trash that&#8217;s coming out of the emergent church that he should have known not to repeat it. If he doesn&#8217;t know what kind of material is coming from Bell and co, what is he doing leading kids who think Bell is the cat&#8217;s pajamas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.pajamapages.com/dangerous-flirtations-with-heresy/comment-page-1/#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pajamapages.com/?p=2808#comment-4981</guid>
		<description>JT:  

John 4:10  Jesus answered her, &quot;If you knew the gift of God, and who it is that is saying to you, &#039;Give me a drink,&#039; you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.&quot;

I think Jesus probably knows what he&#039;s talking about :)

Jesus died for everyone, but saves only those who call on the name of the Lord in faith.  

Acts 2:21:  And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JT:  </p>
<p>John 4:10  Jesus answered her, &#8220;If you knew the gift of God, and who it is that is saying to you, &#8216;Give me a drink,&#8217; you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think Jesus probably knows what he&#8217;s talking about <img src='http://www.pajamapages.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Jesus died for everyone, but saves only those who call on the name of the Lord in faith.  </p>
<p>Acts 2:21:  And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
