Home-run disclaimer

Posted: April 8th, 2009 | Author: | 12 Comments »

In case you need to know it, hear the following:

This blog is mine alone and does not necessarily–or very often–represent the thinking or sentiments of anyone who disagrees with me, my wife, my employer, my friends, my family, my pastor, my brother, my church and, almost certainly, God. After I hit the Publish button, it doesn’t always even reflect my own thinking. It does seem to often reflect the thinking of Tommy F, Twit Conway and some guy in Minnesota, however.

That should cover all the bases.

12 Comments on “Home-run disclaimer”

  1. 1 Taylor said on April 8th, 2009:

    So let me get this straight.
    If you are about to post something, and you know that by posting it God wouldn’t be pleased (or disagree), you still post it anyways?

  2. 2 James Duncan said on April 8th, 2009:

    No. It just means that I don’t want anyone to think that what I write is inspired or that I am infallible, just in case anyone happened to be under that impression.

  3. 3 matt said on April 8th, 2009:

    I’m sorry if I have given off that impression Mr. Duncan.

  4. 4 Tommy F. said on April 8th, 2009:

    Taylor: You have very high expectations. Did you really think that JDuncan speaks for God? I really like much of what JDuncan writes, but let’s not get carried away. Glad the disclaimer clears up that issue.

  5. 5 Twit Conway said on April 8th, 2009:

    I think the closest similarity between what JDuncan writes and speaking for God is the similarity his posts have to 2 Peter 3:16 in that some of JDuncan’s posts are hard to understand which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own distraction (no typo), as they do with other blogs.

    (now hiding under my bed waiting for the lightning)

  6. 6 James Duncan said on April 8th, 2009:

    Tommy and Twit, I put your name in a post and you’re all over it.

    At least now I know how to call on you.

  7. 7 Twit Conway said on April 8th, 2009:

    That dude in MN (wouldn’t be Al Franken would it?) is letting us down!

  8. 8 James Duncan said on April 8th, 2009:

    I’m not certain that Mr. Minnesota has a computer. I just said it reflects his thinking.

  9. 9 Taylor said on April 8th, 2009:

    Oh, ok. I understand now.
    Sorry. When I first read the post earlier today, I miss read it completely.
    My apologies.

  10. 10 Christina said on April 8th, 2009:

    I’m still confused to why you needed to post this. How has someone “[thought] that what [you] write as inspired or that [you are] infallible” ?

  11. 11 James Duncan said on April 8th, 2009:

    It turns out that that comment came from a reply to a comment that, based on a later comment that updated the first comment, misunderstood a comment made about other comments, so perhaps that isn’t happening (except for Matt and Mr. Minnesota).

    It just shows on how little you can build a really long comment thread.

  12. 12 Micah said on April 9th, 2009:

    Wow. That thoroughly confused me. I just thought this post was funny.
    And let’s be serious, if anyone’s getting canonized in modern day, It’s going to be Kanye West.