You said:
No offense, but PN has many more things to do with his time than run a blog like this…I completely agree with you there Duncan!!!

Actually, if you read his twitter, not only does he read this blog (and then pretend he doesn’t), it’s pretty obvious that he responds to it.

You should have kept it right there, because you proceeded to cast a lot of judgements for someone that “doesn’t know.”

The families are the only “victims” here. The two parties involved in this sin are both equally responsible and should repent! And, I pray they do.

Let me get this right, we should not deal with your motives, like you just said, yet, we should listen to you while you try and deal with other people’s motives? Yes, you do have some truth on this blog, yes, you do have some error on this blog, but, you also attack other pastors motives and critize them, and yet your motives cannot be attacked or critized? Shouldn’t you also be tested to see if you are right? If not, does that not make you a hypocrite? I think the ideas we find here are driven by your motives, so, i think your motives matter if you are critizing a church that is so big and powerful. In the same way you say they need to be checked, you also need to be checked because there are people out there who attack them just for the fun of it. Granted, sometimes your posts I feel are just attacking them for the fun of it, and other times I feel you may have a valid point. Take these latest posts, granted, you do put the facts out there, but you also assume somethings based on what you know(or think you know) and it comes across as attacking someone. Take the posts on How Perry Noble’s legalism failed Gary Lamb and The essence of Pharisaism, you took an idea, and, while having good intentions, you made it sound like 2 things, number one, Gary Lamb had the same level of accountablility and the same safeguards in place as Noble, and number 2, that Perry is a fool for trying to protect himself while you also forget to quote the rest of the blog which there is more to it than what you posted. So, For example, we don’t know if Lamb’s and Perry’s methods are the same, also, yes, you do call perry what he says to, the thing people get at is that, they feel like you are against any pastor who tries to protect himelf. So, I think just as you question other people who influnce alot of people motives, your motives, because you have claimed in the past that alot of people read you blog, should also be allowed to be questioned.

PS. No, I’m not calling you an atheist or anything of that nature, I know better, but I figured I haven’t posted in awhile so, I would jump in here. But this time, I left my shovel in the car.

All that matters to you is that I’m the guy who writes this blog. Deal with the ideas you find here, not my identify or motives.

Truth is truth, no matter who it comes from. Error is error, no matter who it comes from. It’s for you to determine whether what you read here is truth or error, not to worry about who is saying it.

BTW, I will continue to deny that I’m really Perry Noble, no matter what conspiracy theories you hear.

Someone who disagrees with a fallen human leader is an atheist?

Think about what you’re saying.