Why online worship is virtually impossible
Posted: August 7th, 2009 | Author: James Duncan | Tags: Online, Senses, Worship | 9 Comments »On his blog, Nick Charalambous has been engaging the question of whether church and worship can be conducted online. He has many thoughtful posts about the issue, but this section from one in January sums up the question nicely:
Could you not have a physical campus-less church and still be the church as Christ intended it?…
Is the disciple-making machinery of church the worship service or the community the worship service creates?
If the technology is here, or coming soon, where sophisticated worship services can be experienced in all their intensity anywhere in HD, the real work ahead for the church is learning how to guide and manage community, the kind of authentic community that, in Acts, added to its number daily and changed the history of the world.
I think a lot is going to boil down to questions about what’s the role of the weekly service in daily worship? And how important will it be to have a weekly physical gathering spot that belongs uniquely to a specific community of believers?
In other words, does worship need a common physical foundation as has traditionally been found in the church sanctuary? My answer to that question is yes. Without a weekly gathering spot we lose the sensuality of worship that God built into it.
Worship is inherently physical. It can’t be fully experienced by clicking a button or watching a screen. Let’s look at ways that worship engages our five physical senses.
- Hearing. In one sense, this is the easiest sense for the online church to satisfy. We hear God’s Word read and taught by preachers. We hear prayer. We hear the worship band and worship leader. Worship can also include the absence of hearing, as found in moments of silence and reflection. One weakness of online worship, however, is that we can’t hear each other. If I do sing along, no one hears my joyful participation, or perhaps notes my lack of participation.
- Sight. Again, another one that is served fairly well by a computer or television screen. We can see the leader. We can see Scripture texts and various artful symbols of God and his works. As with hearing, online worship, for now, doesn’t have the capability to let me see the people I am worshipping with, people who are made in God’s image. Young believers can learn and be encouraged by the behavior of older or more mature saints. The simple ability to see multiple generations of a family worship together communicates profound truths about the body of Christ that is lost if all we see is the preacher and the band.
- Touch. God’s people don’t just assemble, they rumble. Right hands of fellowship are extended. Holy kisses are exchanged. Feet are washed, oils are poured out. We touch each other, but we also touch the sacraments of the Lord’s Supper when we break the bread and hold the cup. Baptism also requires touch.
- Taste. The bread and wine of communion obviously engage this sense. The New Testament church often extended their fellowship into meals. Interestingly, one of the first things we’ll do in Heaven is feast, so good food is a small taste of Heaven. In a more spiritual sense, God tells us to taste and see that he is good (Psalm 34:8).
- Smell. This is listed last because it’s one sense that we don’t engage nearly as much in contemporary worship as the other four. In Old Testament times, however, worship would have had very strong odors with the sweet smells of incense mixed with the more pungent smells of animal and crop sacrifices. To some extent, we do add some pleasant odor to worship with flowers and personal deodorants and fragrances, which some are more likely to wear on Sunday than most other days. Even though we don’t have as many obvious physical fragrances, Ephesians 5:1-2 and Philippians 4:18 tells us that our worship, including giving, is a fragrant offering to him.
When God condemns idolatry, he often does it by pointing out how sense-less the idols were. From Psalm 115:6-8:
They have ears, but cannot hear,
noses, but they cannot smell;they have hands, but cannot feel,
feet, but they cannot walk;nor can they utter a sound with their throats.
Those who make them will be like them,
and so will all who trust in them.
Our God, on the other hand, is a sense-able God who asks to be worshiped in a sensual way.
When we try to worship through a computer screen, we have to first take leave of our senses.
Similar Posts:
- Why worship is more important than evangelism
- Behold the awesome power of age
- Is church a building?
- What if we did football by multisite?
- Is it OK for us to disagree now?
I really don’t see ho online church would be much different than church on TV. It may be a good way to catch a service if you are sick or something, but certainly shouldn’t be substituted for live fellowship.
I agree with James Downing. Our church is experimenting with an “online” service, which is basically a live video feed with an moderated chat room. If I was out of town on business, I’d probably take advantage of it, but I think it would be a poor substitute for actually being in church on a regular basis.
Yeah, online church is a step better than TV church, as at least you can chat with others online.
For those who cannot attend a physical church for whatever reason (sickness, traveling, etc), I think online church is a great option. But I certainly wouldn’t encourage it as an every week alternative.
The only time I’ve watched an online service was when my child was sick and I had to stay home.
I have to agree with you guys on this one. Its great for someone who cannot for what ever reason attend their churches service. I watch churches online across the country that I cannot get to in person so I can be stretched by them and leanr from them. If nothing else, I use it as a means of study, to hear what others have to say and to learn new things. (this is not my only way of learning though) I try and watch one online sermon a day from a different church each week. My current list of 7 guys I watch is Steven Furtick, Mark Batterson, Mark Driscoll, Craig Groschel, Ed Young, Andy Stanley, and of course on Sundays Perry Noble. There are others that I try and throw into the mix every now and then to mix it up a bit.
Right on! I agree!
@ Seth,
You don’t have much variety in that list. I’m not saying that you can’t learn from any of them, but if you want to stretch yourself, I’d recommend looking outside of the contemporary movement for a little while. Maybe some older, wiser theologians/authors…. You pick.
Online church has its good aspects, but I can’t accept the idea of consistently “attending” online church. Those who use online church as a substitue for waking up, preparing for, driving to, participating in, and returning to an actual church service seem lazy to me.
Online church cheapens the act of worship. I’m not certain lounging on the couch in your pajamas honors God. It may make one feel better about himself, though.
Sarah
Yeah, the books/old sermons I read are by other authors. Falwell, Surgeon, Swindoll, C. S. Lewis and more. The list I listed were just those that I watch online. Each one of them has different views and differents styles that I find very intriging.
what does it matter? as long as people are being reached for Christ and the doctrine is sound, who cares if online worship replaces physical in-house worship for some? think of it this way, say you live in florida and really like this church in seattle. if you’re able to attend the seattle church online and be ministered to, what’s wrong with the methods used in online worship?
all you guys have good points. i see how some of the effect is definitely lost in space…well, cyberspace as it were, but it’s not really for me to say whether or not online worship is effective, especially since it has definitely ministered to me at times when i haven’t been able to make it to my church.tv ( i won’t say which church i attend, haha).
but this is definitely a good point you guys are making. keep it up!